May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a great alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it normally as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, that was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain EightVape any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into your mouth, this means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.
And also the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available to buy could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.